FAQS
How are patients impacted by 340B?
The lack of oversight of and transparency into the 340B program means there is no guarantee that discounted drug prices will be passed onto patients or that savings will be reinvested into the community.
How are independent physicians and pharmacists impacted by 340B?
The 340B program incentives lead to consolidation because covered entities can use the discounts to outcompete independent practices, causing them to be bought out or shut down. Additionally, the rise of contract pharmacies owned by PBMs threatens the survival of independent and community pharmacies.
How can 340B return to its intended purpose?
340B is a federal program that needs a federal solution. Lawmakers should enhance transparency and reporting requirements to ensure 340B discounts are being used as intended, not for profit, and protect 340B from abuse by PBM middlemen. Additionally, Congress should balance protecting physician practices and access to community-based services while supporting the sustainability of covered entities’ operations in low-income areas.
How do pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) affect patients?
PBMs control the lists of medications covered by insurance companies and further complicate the drug pricing process. Furthermore, by operating in a “black box” whereby they can negotiate lower drug costs but keep the surplus as profit, they harm patients’ abilities to afford and access the medication they need.
Why are out-of-pocket costs increasing so quickly?
Out-of-pocket costs for critical medications are rising across Florida, especially for insured patients living with chronic diseases. Health insurers and pharmacy benefit managers increasingly require high coinsurance payments – sometimes thousands of dollars out-of-pocket for a single prescription.
While any Floridian can be burdened with high out-of-pocket costs, those most likely affected are living with chronic, debilitating or life-threatening conditions such as cancer, HIV/AIDS, rheumatoid arthritis, hemophilia, multiple sclerosis or epilepsy.
Why are specialty tiers and adverse tiering discriminatory?
Specialty tiers and adverse tiering are discriminatory because they apply most often to Floridians with chronic, debilitating and life-threatening illnesses. These practices run counter to the very concept of insurance. Families pay their insurance premiums expecting that if family members get sick, they can afford care. Instead, specialty tiers and adverse tiering shift necessary treatment costs to the people who need it most.
Why doesn’t the Affordable Care Act fix these problems?
The ACA established an annual limit of $6,850 for individuals and $13,700 for families on out-of-pocket spending. However, it did not establish a cap for spending on individual drugs and medical services. Therefore, patients might have to pay a substantial deductible, copay or coinsurance bill at the point of sale or service. Further, not all medical expenses apply toward the ACA limit. Out-of-network providers, services and medications that are not covered by a patient’s health plan, as well as benefit services deemed “non-essential” might not be included in the annual out-of-pocket maximum.